Home

About Us

The Team

Philosophy

Products

Midcap

Large Cap Value

Custom Midcap

Large Cap Core
Peer
Returns
Characteristics
Parameters

MegaCap

Publications

Contact Us

Staff Web

Shenandoah Large Cap Core Strategy - Portfolio Holdings, Sector Weights, and Characteristics

 

Top Ten Holdings (6/30/2010)
 

Security Name Ticker Portfolio Weight (%) Sector
APPLE INC AAPL 2.8 Information Technology
MICROSOFT CORP MSFT 2.5 Information Technology
JOHNSON & JOHNSON JNJ 2.4 Health Care
IBM IBM 2.4 Information Technology
GENERAL ELECTRIC GE 2.2 Industrials
AT&T CORP T 2.2 Telecom Services
CHEVRONTEXACO CVX 2.2 Energy
BANK OF AMERICA BAC 2.1 Financials
EXXON MOBIL CORP XOM 1.9 Energy
INTEL INTC 1.9 Information Technology
Total Held in Top 10 Holdings   22.5  
 

Sector Weights (%)
The chart below shows the Standard & Poor's Global Industry Classification Standards (GICS®) Sector Weights resulting from the portfolio holdings for the most recent quarter end.

 

Portfolio Characteristics
The table below shows the characteristics of the resulting portfolio as of the most recent quarter end.

Characteristic Portfolio
Number of Holdings 160
Wtd. Average Market Capitalization (millions) 60,683
Median Market Capitalization (millions) 6,279
P/E Last Fiscal Year 15.1
P/E Next Fiscal Year 13.3
Price/Book 2.6
Price/Sales 2.3
Price to Cash Flow 9.0
Dividend Yield 1.8
Historical Growth Rate 9.8
Future Growth Rate 10.7
Return on Equity 18.4
Predicted Beta (vs S&P 500) 1.1
 

 

Sources
Russell Top 200®, Midcap®, and 1000® Indexes are registered trademarks of the
Russell Investment Group
Plan Sponsor Network (PSN) is a product of
Informa Investment Solutions
Global Industry Classification Standards (GICS®) are a registered trademark of Standard & Poor's and MSCI BARRA
Portfolio characteristics compiled from data supplied by The Applied Finance Group, LTD.

HYPOTHETICAL PERFORMANCE DISCLOSURE
Past Hypothetical Performance does not guarantee future actual results. Hypothetical results have many inherent limitations. No representation is being made that any account will or is likely to achieve returns similar to those shown. In fact, there are frequently sharp differences between hypothetical performance results and the actual results subsequently achieved by any particular investment strategy.

One of the limitations of hypothetical performance results is that they are generally prepared with the benefit of hindsight. In addition, hypothetical investment does not involve financial risk, and no hypothetical investment record can completely account for the impact of financial risk in actual investing. For example, the ability to withstand losses or to adhere to a particular investment strategy in spite of investment losses are material points which can also adversely affect actual investment results. There are numerous other factors related to the markets in general or to the implementation of any specific investment strategy which cannot be fully accounted for in the preparation of hypothetical performance results and all of which can adversely affect actual investment results.

Performance for periods greater than one year is annualized. Gross returns (including realized and unrealized capital gains, reinvestment of dividends and interest) are before fees and administrative expenses. Net returns reflect the return to investors after all fees and administrative expenses. Net returns are NOT provided here as they are a determined by the fee level, which is a function of the assets under management in the client's specific application. We will be happy to provide simulated net returns by applying a fee level based upon a client-specified asset level.

 
 

Copyright ©2010 Shenandoah Asset Management, LLC All rights reserved.

This Web Site is not intended for distribution to, or use by, any person or entity in any jurisdiction or country where such distribution or use would be contrary to local law or regulation.